Our world lives mostly utilitarian, for that utility has become a test of truth. If there is something that can be applied and useful, it is also meaningful and hence real. It is sometimes identified with a pragmatic point of view, a hypothesis that functions purely based on sensibility similar to animal perceptions. Subhuman instincts are seen in animals functioning on pure utility logic - whatever satisfies hunger and sex and the instinct guard for life is real. But in humans there are additional factors: ego - whatever satisfies it is also real. This encouragement satisfaction is finally a utility factor, and they must be real so that their satisfaction and his colleagues are real.
But, what is meant by being real? Tentatively speaking, for the real thing to stay in time and space as he faces by the central consciousness. Now, this drags the time factor and space also into reality. But what is the reason behind this assessment that being real is to survive in space and time? We must conclude that this is the only way in which awareness that experiences can decide the nature of reality. This position seems to land us in a question that we will discuss immediately.
It is realized by some pure utilities it cannot always be a test of truth. Mirage's water perception under the idea that it is real water can bring to the minds of entertaining people. But, even though the comfort may be real, the cause is not real. Lunch served in a dream can calm a hungry man in a dream. Fake news because it has won a victory or get a lottery can bring satisfaction whose causes are not real. The incorrect news about the death of the only son of a mother can even kill him, and while his heart pause is real because it is not real. This kind of incident and the normal view of society has made people hold that truth must be in accordance with the facts. Outside utilities are correspondence.
Now, the idea that the fact correspondence is the truth exam implies that we are able to know the facts, and therefore the truth. But what exactly is it? Again, we found our criteria for our persistence in our space and time. It sounds almost like a vicious circle from where we can't escape. Even ghosts can survive in space and time, like Air Mirage. There seems to be, in the end, there are no criteria to know the truth if we only rely on utility theory or the theory of correspondence of truth.
Thinkers have argued that the truth test, in the end, is coherence. Parts must be organically suitable for themselves. Utilities and correspondence do not meet this test because while they seem to satisfy one part of the process of knowledge, they are contrary to other parts. The process of knowing is the whole organic organic organizations that are related to where the parts are mutually consistent with each other. There should be no contradiction in the constitution and it should not be exceeded by another experience. In addition, it will not be truth but the opposite. The fact should not only satisfy senses, thoughts, intelligence and feelings, so as to serve utility purposes, but also according to the existing facts. But the existence of the fact should not be tentatively solely; It should also be in the past and must continue in the future. Air Mirage, for example, is not in the future, because when someone approaches it, it recedes from someone's contact and then disappears at a certain difference point in a state that causes his appearance. It must also be consistent and consistent with experience forming parts. We say that the wake experience is real because we see the same things throughout our lives and life objects have been seen can be applied to our personality because they also stand in the past, future and future of our lifetime. They satisfy 'me, you and others', at the same time. They are coherent towards the practical system of our assessment of truth, that is, they do not have their own differences and are true for everyone, every time and in everything.
This analysis will state that there are no other truth assessment standards than what is provided in a wakeful life. We usually forget that there are fine obstacles even in the truth of this relative coherence (Vyavaharika Satta). The object is mutually consistent with other experiences of them in terms of persistence in space and time is the conclusion of certain observers to whom everything is observed in the observed position. How does someone feel confident that other people exist and space and time does exist except by referring to yourself, with the condition of a person's body, regulating sensory organs, mental state and emotional reaction? Often we hear objective facts, objective references, and extramental reality. This is a big prejudice of what is known as scientific thinking, which is slowly broken by serious thinkers in the field of science itself, who has realized that there is no observation or scientific conclusion that can be considered a final, so. As long as they are the result of an approach made by the awareness that works in terms of sensory conditions and mental personalities of scientists who act like a prism where awareness will be deflected, diversified, mutilated and given structure and form. This will mean that the truth because it cannot be known both by science or philosophy, as long as the methodology used by these techniques cannot be separated from the terms and conditions of psycho-physical organisms that limit awareness and do not know this. Observations, and experiments, logic and arguments in vain, in the end, in the search for someone's truth.
But those who come to this decision are debated questions. It is none other than self-felt in the liver that cannot be separated from consciousness, which does not support external evidence or verification and splash the independence guidelines of mutual even when it passes the operating contorti through the body and mind. There is no objective way, in the modern scientific sense of the term, by knowing the truth, for all 'objectivity' is the result of awareness that operates through a medium whose structure will definitely condition it. This will imply that truth is realized in the subjectivity of pure consciousness, which is divested from all externalities: actually the truth is awareness. The state of this awareness is inclusive of the overall truth. Facts, thus, is not objective, because awareness is not objective.
There is a big difference between solipsism and this position that is naturally charged from analysis of experience, because the awareness here is not the subject of OBJ etc. but the subject is pure, regardless of the object and, it is absolute. Here philosophy and science meet together and experience stands are not divided by the differences in subjects and predicates or Knober and are known. This pure experience is free of limitations of the body, thoughts and objects naturally transcendence for all of them even though they are in each of them. This is the god of religion, absolute philosophy, the truth that has become the goal of the search for all thinkers for a long time. This is the highest object of meditation by Yogi. Thus the self-realization is complexized and co-eternal with the realization of God.
The culture of mankind must record this basic principle, and the sciences and art must be consistent in their pursuit with the purpose of this existence. The externality of the Krasan approach adopted by materialism so far from the truth when the pole stands apart. Human sciences and technology companies based on them will definitely take humans away from the truth and sink it in sadness if this is to form only means for outside comfort and waves. It also follows hatred of all types, prejudices and wars are voices made by clouds who pass through an accident that tries to darken the sun's divinity consciousness. For the same reason the modern mechanistic psychology of education is wrong, because it is not soulless. The mind brings the body weight of worldly learning and knowledge of objects, while his life is slowly being sought from in the dissociation of the truth. The way to the discovery of the highest truth increases gradually from an understanding that is not concerned with each other, from cooperation in the harmony of existence, and from harmony to inseparable absolute.
0 Comments